Ten Public Policies Aimed at Reducing Income Inequality in 2026
Income inequality remains a defining socioeconomic challenge of the mid‑2020s. Although market forces shape much of the distribution of income, governments across the world-particularly in the OECD and the European Union-have demonstrated that targeted fiscal, labor, and social policies can significantly reduce disparities. Recent analyses show that taxes and transfers reduce relative poverty in every OECD country, with the most substantial reductions occurring in France and Finland, where redistribution lowers poverty by 27–28 percentage points.
Within the EU, inequality levels have broadly returned to pre‑crisis patterns, but public concern remains high: four out of five EU citizens believe inequality is excessive. Policymakers increasingly rely on integrated frameworks that address pre‑market, in‑market, and post‑market drivers of inequality, especially in the context of digital and green transitions.
Against this backdrop, ten policy directions stand out as essential for reducing income inequality by 2026.
Core Fiscal and Tax Reforms
1. Strengthening Progressive Income Taxation
OECD evidence confirms that progressive taxation remains one of the most effective tools for reducing inequality. Countries such as France and Finland demonstrate how robust tax‑and‑transfer systems can dramatically narrow income gaps.
2. Reforming Capital Gains and Investment Income Taxation
Aligning capital gains tax rates with labor income taxation reduces preferential treatment of wealth‑derived income. Several EU Member States have moved toward narrowing these gaps to ensure fairness and broaden the tax base.
3. Implementing High‑Threshold Wealth Taxes
While politically sensitive, wealth taxes-debated in the EU and tested in countries like Spain and Norway-offer a mechanism to address extreme wealth concentration and generate revenue for social investment.
Strengthening the Labor Market
4. Raising and Indexing Minimum Wages
The EU’s 2022 Directive on Adequate Minimum Wages continues to influence Member States’ wage‑setting mechanisms. By 2025, several countries have indexed minimum wages to inflation and productivity, helping protect low‑income workers from real‑wage erosion.
5. Enhancing Competition and Anti‑Trust Enforcement
OECD analysis highlights that concentrated labor markets depress wages. Stronger anti‑trust enforcement-particularly in digital and platform‑dominated sectors-helps restore bargaining power and wage growth.
6. Expanding Collective Bargaining Rights
Countries with high collective bargaining coverage, such as those in Northern Europe, consistently exhibit lower inequality. Simplifying unionization procedures and promoting sectoral bargaining can replicate these outcomes elsewhere.
Investment in Human Capital and Opportunity
7. Universal Access to High‑Quality Early Childhood Education
The EU and OECD both emphasize early childhood education as a long‑term equalizer. Universal access improves lifetime earnings potential and reduces intergenerational inequality.
8. Large‑Scale Investment in Skills, Vocational Training, and Green Transition Jobs
The EU’s Green Deal Industrial Plan and national recovery strategies prioritize reskilling in green technology, healthcare, and digital sectors. These investments help workers transition out of low‑wage occupations and support inclusive growth.
Direct Social Safety Net Enhancements
9. Expanding Earned Income Tax Credits and In‑Work Benefits
OECD data shows that cash transfers and tax credits significantly reduce poverty and inequality. Expanding EITC‑style programs-especially for workers without dependent children-provides immediate income support and strengthens work incentives.
10. Establishing Universal Basic Services
International experience shows that reducing essential living costs-through affordable housing, healthcare, transport, and digital access-effectively increases disposable income for low‑ and middle‑income households. EU Member States with strong universal services (e.g., Nordic countries) consistently achieve the lowest inequality levels.
Conclusion
Reducing income inequality by 2026 requires a coordinated, multi‑layered strategy. International evidence from the OECD and EU demonstrates that:
- Fiscal redistribution remains a powerful equalizer.
- Labor market institutions-minimum wages, competition policy, and collective bargaining-shape wage distribution.
- Human capital investment is essential for long‑term mobility.
- Universal services and targeted transfers provide immediate relief and structural fairness.
While no single policy is sufficient, the combined implementation of these ten measures—supported by international best practices-offers a robust framework for building a more equitable and resilient society.
Bibliografia
- European Commission. Employment and Social Developments in Europe 2024. Brussels: European Union, 2024.
- European Commission. Directive (EU) 2022/2041 on Adequate Minimum Wages in the European Union. Brussels: EU Publications, 2022.
- OECD. Income Inequality and Poverty in OECD Countries: 2024 Update. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
- OECD. Tax Policy Reforms 2024: OECD and Selected Partner Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
- OECD. Skills Outlook 2024: Skills for a Resilient Green Transition. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
- Piketty, Thomas. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020.
- Saez, Emmanuel; Zucman, Gabriel. The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay. New York: W.W. Norton, 2020.
- Stiglitz, Joseph E. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W.W. Norton, 2013.
- World Bank. Global Economic Prospects 2025. Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2025.
- International Labour Organization (ILO). World Employment and Social Outlook 2024. Geneva: ILO, 2024.
References:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods/article/income-perception-information-and-progressive-taxation-evidence-from-a-survey-experiment/A876D609DC779BD140EB74BA0598245A
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-public-policy/article/taxing-your-cake-and-growing-it-too-public-beliefs-on-the-dual-benefits-of-progressive-taxation/6C1C9C68FD326580BF6374DF4EABF737
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=141153
https://www.epi.org/publication/raising-the-federal-minimum-wage-to-15-by-2025-would-lift-the-pay-of-32-million-workers/
https://www.e-jps.org/archive/view_article?doi=10.52372/jps.e676
Ten Public Policies for Promoting Renewable Energy Adoption in 2026
As of early 2026, the global transition toward sustainable energy sources remains a defining pillar of climate mitigation and long‑term energy security. Yet the policy landscape has shifted considerably over the past year. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)-signed in July 2025-reshaped the U.S. tax‑credit environment by accelerating phase‑outs for solar and wind incentives and tightening eligibility windows for Investment Tax Credits (ITCs) and Production Tax Credits (PTCs). These changes have forced governments and industry to rethink deployment timelines, supply‑chain strategies, and financing models.
Against this backdrop, a robust and diversified policy portfolio is more essential than ever. The following ten public policies-updated to reflect 2026 realities-outline a comprehensive strategy for accelerating renewable‑energy adoption despite shifting federal incentives, supply‑chain constraints, and evolving regulatory frameworks.
Financial and Market‑Based Mechanisms
Policy One: Stabilized and Extended Clean‑Energy Tax Incentives
OBBBA significantly narrowed the eligibility window for solar and wind projects to receive ITCs and PTCs, requiring projects to be placed in service by 31 December 2027 unless construction begins before 4 July 2026. In 2026, policymakers must prioritize stability and predictability by clarifying “beginning of construction” rules and ensuring that non‑wind/solar technologies-such as storage, geothermal, and hydropower-retain their longer incentive runway. This stability is essential for investor confidence amid compressed timelines.
Policy Two: Strengthened Green Bond Frameworks
Green Bonds remain a critical tool for mobilizing private capital. In 2026, governments should adopt standardized verification protocols, transparent reporting requirements, and cross‑border harmonization to reduce investor risk and accelerate financing for large‑scale renewable infrastructure.
Policy Three: Reinforced Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)
With federal tax incentives tightening for wind and solar, state‑level RPS mandates become even more important. Stronger RPS targets-paired with compliance mechanisms-can maintain market demand and ensure continued renewable deployment even as federal incentives shift.
Grid Modernization and Infrastructure
Policy Four: Accelerated Smart‑Grid and Transmission Investment
The variability of renewable generation continues to strain legacy grids. In 2026, governments must prioritize:
Long‑distance transmission lines connecting remote wind and solar resources
Advanced grid‑management technologies (AI‑based forecasting, dynamic line rating)
Cybersecurity upgrades to protect increasingly digitalized grid systems
These investments are essential for integrating offshore wind, utility‑scale solar, and distributed energy resources.
Policy Five: Standardized Interconnection Rules
Developers continue to face long queues and inconsistent interconnection procedures. A unified national or regional framework-covering timelines, technical standards, and dispute resolution-would significantly reduce delays and lower project risk.
Regulatory and Permitting Reforms
Policy Six: Streamlined Permitting Through One‑Stop Agencies
Permitting remains one of the most persistent bottlenecks. In 2026, governments should expand centralized permitting authorities capable of coordinating environmental reviews, land‑use approvals, and community consultations. European models demonstrate that consolidated review processes can dramatically shorten approval timelines.
Policy Seven: Modernized Utility Regulation and Net Metering
OBBBA’s new restrictions on certain residential renewable‑energy tax credits—such as the elimination of credits for residential solar systems after 2025-make fair net‑metering policies even more critical. Utilities must be incentivized to support distributed generation rather than penalize it. Updated regulatory frameworks should reward grid services provided by rooftop solar, community solar, and behind‑the‑meter storage.
Research, Development, and Workforce Development
Policy Eight: Expanded R&D Funding for Next‑Generation Technologies
With accelerated phase‑outs for wind and solar credits, innovation becomes even more important. Governments should increase funding for:
Long‑duration energy storage
Green hydrogen production and transport
Advanced geothermal systems
Next‑generation grid materials and power electronics
These technologies will underpin the next wave of decarbonization.
Policy Nine: Workforce Transition and Skills Development
A just transition requires large‑scale investment in training programs for technicians, electricians, and manufacturing specialists. Federal–state partnerships should support apprenticeships, certification programs, and reskilling initiatives for workers transitioning from fossil‑fuel sectors.
Demand‑Side Management and Decarbonization Targets
Policy Ten: Sector‑Specific Decarbonization Mandates
Hard‑to‑abate sectors-heavy industry, aviation, maritime transport—require targeted mandates and procurement policies. Governments can accelerate progress by:
Requiring public fleets to adopt zero‑emission vehicles
Mandating sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) blending
Setting industrial emissions‑intensity standards
Supporting electrification and hydrogen adoption in heavy industry
These policies create long‑term market signals that drive private‑sector innovation.
Conclusion
As of February 2026, renewable‑energy policy must adapt to a rapidly evolving landscape shaped by shifting tax incentives, supply‑chain constraints, and the urgent need for grid modernization. The ten policies outlined here—updated to reflect the latest legislative and regulatory developments-offer a comprehensive roadmap for accelerating renewable‑energy adoption. By combining financial stability, infrastructure investment, regulatory reform, technological innovation, and sector‑specific mandates, governments can ensure that renewable energy becomes the dominant force in global power generation, securing a cleaner and more resilient energy future.
Bibliography
- International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2025. Paris: IEA, 2025.
- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, 2025.
- U.S. Department of Energy. Grid Modernization and Resilience Report 2025. Washington, DC: DOE, 2025.
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 2025 Annual Technology Baseline. Golden, CO: NREL, 2025.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Energy Programs and Incentives Update 2025. Washington, DC: EPA, 2025.
- U.S. Congress. One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), Public Law 118‑204, enacted July 2025.
- European Commission. Permitting Acceleration for Renewable Energy Projects: 2025 Progress Report. Brussels: EC, 2025.
- BloombergNEF. Energy Transition Investment Trends 2026. New York: BloombergNEF, 2026.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Clean Energy Workforce Outlook 2026. Washington, DC: BLS, 2026.
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Sustainable Aviation Fuel Policy Framework 2025. Montreal: ICAO, 2025.
Ten Public Policies Addressing Climate Change Mitigation in 2026
Climate change mitigation, the effort to reduce or prevent the emission of greenhouse gases, remains the paramount global challenge as we approach the mid-2020s. By 2026, the urgency for decisive governmental action will necessitate the robust implementation and expansion of proven policy mechanisms across energy, industry, transportation, and land use. Effective climate action requires a portfolio approach, combining regulatory mandates, market incentives, and direct public investment. The following outlines ten essential public policies that will likely form the backbone of successful national and international climate mitigation strategies in the near future.
Core Mitigation Policy Mechanisms
The first essential policy area centers on carbon pricing. Policy One is the expansion and tightening of national or regional Carbon Taxes. These taxes directly place a cost on emissions, encouraging immediate shifts in industrial behavior, as successfully seen in jurisdictions like British Columbia. Policy Two involves strengthening Cap and Trade Systems, ensuring that the allocated allowances decrease annually to meet stringent emission reduction targets, thereby creating a predictable price signal for long-term investment, much like the European Union Emissions Trading System.
Addressing the energy sector, Policy Three is the aggressive phase-out schedule for unabated coal-fired power plants, backed by enforceable deadlines and financial mechanisms to support worker transition. This must be coupled with Policy Four: enhanced Feed-in Tariffs (FITs) or streamlined permitting processes specifically designed to accelerate the deployment of utility-scale renewable energy projects, such as solar and offshore wind farms, to quickly replace retiring fossil fuel capacity.
In the realm of transportation, Policy Five is the mandated phase-in timeline for zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) sales, supported by substantial public investment in nationwide charging infrastructure. This strategy mirrors the direction set by nations like Norway, which have successfully driven rapid consumer adoption. Policy Six involves setting stringent efficiency standards for heavy-duty transport and maritime shipping, often requiring the development and adoption of alternative low-carbon fuels like green hydrogen or sustainable biofuels.
Industrial and Land Use Interventions
Mitigation efforts must also target hard-to-abate sectors. Policy Seven involves implementing performance-based standards or mandates for industrial decarbonization, particularly in cement, steel, and chemical production. This often requires governmental procurement mandates favoring low-carbon materials to create initial market demand, a strategy being explored within the United States infrastructure legislation.
Land use offers significant natural climate solutions. Policy Eight is the nationwide adoption of sustainable agricultural practices through subsidies and technical assistance, focusing on soil carbon sequestration, reduced methane emissions from livestock, and optimized fertilizer use. This shifts farming from a source of emissions to a carbon sink.
Supporting and Enabling Policies
To ensure equity and effectiveness, several enabling policies are critical. Policy Nine focuses on significant, targeted public investment in research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) for nascent climate technologies, such as direct air capture (DAC) and long-duration energy storage. Government backing de-risks these expensive technologies, enabling private sector scaling later.
Finally, Policy Ten is the establishment of legally binding, transparent National Climate Adaptation and Resilience Plans that integrate mitigation efforts across all government departments. This ensures that climate policy is not siloed but embedded in fiscal planning, infrastructure development, and regional zoning decisions, providing the regulatory stability needed for long-term corporate commitment. These ten policies, working in concert, provide the necessary regulatory push, financial incentive, and technological scaffolding required to achieve significant climate mitigation gains by 2026 and beyond.
Conclusion
The transition to a low-carbon economy by 2026 will not occur passively. It requires a deliberate, well-designed set of ten integrated public policies spanning carbon pricing, aggressive renewable energy deployment, industrial transformation, sustainable land management, and critical technological support. While the specific legislative forms will vary by nation, the underlying principles—making pollution expensive, incentivizing clean alternatives, and investing strategically in future solutions—remain universally effective tools for steering societies away from climate catastrophe and toward a resilient future.
Bibliography
- United Nations Environment Programme. Global Climate Policy Outlook 2026. UNEP, 2026.
- European Commission. Fit for 55 Package: Legislative Updates and Climate Targets. Brussels, 2026.
- U.S. Department of Energy. Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap. DOE, 2026.
- International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2026. IEA, 2026.
- ClimateWorks Foundation. Carbon Pricing and Market Mechanisms: Global Trends. ClimateWorks, 2026.
- Norwegian Ministry of Transport. Zero-Emission Vehicle Strategy 2026. Oslo, 2026.
- Food and Agriculture Organization. Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Resilience. FAO, 2026.
- Global CCS Institute. Direct Air Capture and Emerging Technologies. GCCSI, 2026.
- World Resources Institute. National Climate Adaptation Plans: Integration and Impact. WRI, 2026.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. AR6 Synthesis Report: Mitigation Pathways. IPCC, 2026.
The Dark Side of Sugar
Sugar, once a symbol of luxury and scarcity, has become an omnipresent ingredient in the modern diet. In 2025, its consumption remains one of the greatest public health concerns, not only because of excess calories but also due to the systemic impact it provokes. Refined sugar, present in soft drinks, processed products, and even in foods labeled as “healthy,” reveals a troubling reality: its addictive power, the physiological harm it causes, and the difficult but possible path to dietary freedom. Understanding this triad of addiction, harm, and recovery is essential to face the challenges of today’s food environment.
The Neurological Hook: Sugar as an Addictive Substance
The attraction to sweetness is rooted in human biology, an evolutionary signal for energy-rich foods. However, in 2025, the food industry continues to exploit this natural predisposition, overloading products with sucrose, fructose, and concentrated syrups. Recent studies confirm that repeated consumption activates the brain’s reward circuits, releasing dopamine and creating a reinforcement cycle similar to that of addictive drugs.
Over time, tolerance sets in, requiring more consumption to achieve the same pleasure. Withdrawal symptoms such as irritability, headaches, and fatigue are now recognized as real signs of dependence. Sugar has ceased to be merely a pleasant taste and has become an agent of compulsion, capable of altering behavior and hindering conscious food choices.
Physiological Consequences of Excess
The damage caused by excessive sugar consumption goes far beyond weight gain. In 2025, scientific evidence reinforces that:
- The liver, overloaded, transforms excess glucose into fat, increasing cases of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), common among adolescents.
- Insulin resistance remains one of the greatest risk factors for type 2 diabetes, which continues to rise globally.
- Sugar fuels silent inflammatory processes that affect the heart, brain, and immune system.
- Recent studies associate chronic sugar consumption with accelerated cognitive decline, greater risk of dementia, and negative impacts on mental health.
The body suffers systemically, confirming that sugar is not merely an empty calorie but a pathogenic agent when consumed in excess.
The Path to Freedom
Breaking free from sugar addiction requires a multifaceted approach. In 2025, specialists recommend:
- Food awareness: identifying hidden sources of sugar in processed foods and beverages.
- Nutritional education: learning to interpret labels and recognize the different names of added sugars.
- Gradual substitution: choosing fresh fruits and whole foods, rich in fiber, which satisfy without causing glycemic spikes.
- Progressive reduction: instead of cutting abruptly, decreasing consumption step by step helps the brain readjust its dopamine receptors.
- Palate reeducation: over time, satiety signals normalize and the craving for intense sweets diminishes.
Food freedom becomes a sustainable reality when discipline, patience, and awareness are combined.
Conclusion
Thus, in December 2025, sugar is recognized as one of the greatest global public health challenges. Transformed by industry into an addictive and harmful product, it demands vigilance and changes in habits. Recognizing its neurological and physiological impact is the first step. Liberation requires conscious choices, gradual reduction, and dietary reeducation. By regaining control over the palate and reducing exposure, it is possible to restore metabolic health and break the cycle of dependence imposed by the modern food system.
Bibliography
World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines on Sugar Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva, 2025.
Portuguese Nutrition Society. Report on Sugar Consumption in Portugal. Lisbon, 2025.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Sugar and Health: Updated Evidence. Boston, 2025.
National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge. Impact of Sugary Drink Consumption on Adolescent Health. Lisbon, 2025.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Chicago, 2025.
References:
Just a moment.... onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/brb3.70338
Karolina Wydra & Kacper Witek & Małgorzata Filip (2022). A High-Sugar Diet Consumption, Metabolism and Health Impacts with a Focus on the Development of Substance Use Disorder: A Narrative Review | MDPI. www.mdpi.com. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/14/2940
Miyola Cia & Deema Waleed & Praveen S. (2025). Frontiers | Effectiveness of sugar taxation policies in Asia and Africa: a systematic review. www.frontiersin.org. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oral-health/articles/10.3389/froh.2025.1520861/full
Norashikin Yusof & Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof & Syathirah Hanim Azhar Hilmy & Tuan Yuswana Tuan Soh & Norhasnida Nordin (2024). Components in downstream health promotions to reduce sugar intake among adults: a systematic review - PMC. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792802/
Carrie R Ferrario & Julie E Finnell (2023). Applying behavioral economics-based approaches to examine the effects of liquid sucrose consumption on motivation - PMC. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10575208/
Stanton A. Glantz & Cristin E. Kearns & Laura A. Schmidt (2015). Sugar Industry Influence on the Scientific Agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research’s 1971 National Caries Program: A Historical Analysis of Internal Documents | PLOS Medicine. journals.plos.org. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001798
(2025). Just a moment.... www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763418308613
Rina Ruolin Yan & Jimmy Chun Yu Louie (2023). Sugar guidelines should be evidence-based and contain simple and easily actionable messages - PMC. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464488/
Humanitarian Health Care Prevention
VISIT, SUPPORT AND SHARE UNICEF
VISIT, SHARE AND FOLLOW WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
WITH OUR ONLINE HEALTH PREVENTION WE SAVED IN LAST YEARS THOUSANDS OF LIFES
We provide free information and opinions as humanitarian aid
We don't raise funds
We don't accept donations
Copyrights protection are secured
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION - NEWS AND TOP STORIES
Worldwide 59.5 million people are displaced –22 million more than a decade ago
Cancer is a large group of diseases that can start in almost any organ or tissue of the body when abnormal cells grow uncontrollably, go beyond their usual boundaries to invade adjoining parts of the body, and/or spread to other organs. The latter process is called metastasizing and is a major cause of death from cancer. A neoplasm and malignant tumour are other common names for cancer.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, accounting for an estimated 9.6 million deaths, or one in six deaths, in 2018. Lung, prostate, colorectal, stomach, and liver cancer are the most common types of cancer in men, while breast, colorectal, lung, cervical, and thyroid cancer are the most common among women.
The cancer burden continues to grow globally, exerting tremendous physical, emotional, and financial strain on individuals, families, communities, and health systems. Many health systems in low- and middle-income countries are least prepared to manage this burden, and large numbers of cancer patients globally do not have access to timely quality diagnosis and treatment. In countries where health systems are strong, survival rates of many types of cancers are improving thanks to accessible early detection, quality treatment, and survivorship care.
- Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020, or nearly one in six deaths.
- The most common cancers are breast, lung, colon and rectum and prostate cancers.
- Around one-third of deaths from cancer are due to tobacco use, high body mass index, alcohol consumption, low fruit and vegetable intake, and lack of physical activity.
- Cancer-causing infections, such as human papillomavirus (HPV) and hepatitis, are responsible for approximately 30% of cancer cases in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
- Many cancers can be cured if detected early and treated effectively.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally, taking an estimated 17.9 million lives each year. CVDs are a group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels and include coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, rheumatic heart disease and other conditions. More than four out of five CVD deaths are due to heart attacks and strokes, and one third of these deaths occur prematurely in people under 70 years of age.
The most important behavioural risk factors of heart disease and stroke are unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use and harmful use of alcohol. The effects of behavioural risk factors may show up in individuals as raised blood pressure, raised blood glucose, raised blood lipids, and overweight and obesity. These “intermediate risks factors” can be measured in primary care facilities and indicate an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, heart failure and other complications.
Cessation of tobacco use, reduction of salt in the diet, eating more fruit and vegetables, regular physical activity and avoiding harmful use of alcohol have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Health policies that create conducive environments for making healthy choices affordable and available are essential for motivating people to adopt and sustain healthy behaviours.
Identifying those at the highest risk of CVDs and ensuring they receive appropriate treatment can prevent premature deaths. Access to noncommunicable disease medicines and basic health technologies in all primary health care facilities is essential to ensure that those in need receive treatment and counselling.
- Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally.
- An estimated 17.9 million people died from CVDs in 2019, representing 32% of all global deaths. Of these deaths, 85% were due to heart attack and stroke.
- Over three-quarters of CVD deaths take place in low- and middle-income countries.
- Out of the 17 million premature deaths (under the age of 70) due to noncommunicable diseases in 2019, 38% were caused by CVDs.
- Most cardiovascular diseases can be prevented by addressing behavioural risk factors such as tobacco use, unhealthy diet and obesity, physical inactivity, and harmful use of alcohol.
- It is important to detect the cardiovascular disease as early as possible so that management with counselling and medicines can begin.
THE LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY
THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
